| Author: |
|
Art & Language |
|
|
| Posted: |
08.06.2001; 18:42:32 |
| Topic: |
WORK |
| Msg #: |
404 (top msg in thread) |
| Enclosure: |
|
| Prev/Next: |
403/405 |
| Reads: |
9466 |
404 WORK If it is agreed that we should go-on opportunistically, is there a difference between our use of the entire theoretical/ideological framework of Philosophy of Science and our use of certain specific notions from Philosophy of Science? -> A priori 26; Ambiguity 6; Art enquiry 46; Categorical scheme 81; Heuristic 147, 148, 153, 154, 156; Ideology 174, 175; Opportunist A & L 251; Philosophy 267, 269; Pragmatics 277; Problematic 282; Theory 346, 348; Work 401, 402, 403; Work, pragmatics of 408; & Blik 75; Conversational matrix 116; Heuristic 144; Knowledge 192; Logical 221; Opportunism 246, 247, 249, 250; Philosophy 264; Reading 305; Translation 364; < 403 | 404 | 405 >
|
